On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:16:48PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi guys,
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:08:56PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> > IMHO: a better name would be 'stats nounsedsockets', as it is referring to a
> > generic functionality of UNIX stats socket, rather to a very specific 
> > functionality.
> Just two things on this :
>   - it's not directly related to the stats socket but it's a global
>     behaviour of the process so it should not be under "stats" ;
>   - please guys, don't stick words without a '-' as a delimitor
>     anymore, we've made this mistake in the past with "forceclose",
>     "httpclose" or "dontlognull" or whatever and some of them are
>     really hard to read. That's why we now split the words using
>     dashes, so that would be "no-unused-sockets" or I don't remember
>     the other name Olivier proposed, but please use the same principle
>     which leaves no ambiguity on how to parse it.

Fine, just beacuse it's you, I'll change that.


Reply via email to