Hey Илья,

Looks fine and clean. I guess that we would use existing project name (Haproxy) 
or you would like to continue with your own?

Last, I wonder do we really need verbose (V=1) builds and do you think if they 
make sense for Coverity builds?


Thanks,
D.

> On 30 Jul 2019, at 10:35, Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dinko,
> 
> please have a look
> 
> https://github.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/coverity/.travis.yml#L37-L45 
> <https://github.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/coverity/.travis.yml#L37-L45>
> 
> 
> what do you think (if we will move that to https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy 
> <https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy>) ?
> 
> ср, 17 июл. 2019 г. в 16:36, Dinko Korunic <dinko.koru...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:dinko.koru...@gmail.com>>:
> Dear Илья,
> 
> I’ve increased your access level to Contributor/Member. I terms of Travis-CI 
> scans, there are some catch22s with current Coverity suite as it is compiled 
> against ancient glibc and ancient kernel headers and requires 
> vsyscall=emulate kernel boot option to properly work — not sure if that will 
> be possible on Travis VMs at all.
> 
> I have actual weekly builds that are auto-published to our Coverity Scan 
> account and they well, require manual interventions, flagging and some day to 
> day work to get to more usable levels — let me know if you need a hand with 
> this. You should have all the access required for doing so right now.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> D.
> 
>> On 17 Jul 2019, at 13:18, Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:chipits...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello, yep, contributor/member would be nice. Also, I can setup automated 
>> travis-ci scans
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019, 3:27 PM Dinko Korunic <dinko.koru...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:dinko.koru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hey Илья,
>> 
>> Let me know if you would like Contributor/Member role for your account on 
>> Haproxy Coverity account. I was initially more involved and I have started 
>> configuring modules and parts of code blocks into coherent units, but 
>> stopped at some point due to lack of time and interest.
>> 
>> There have been a lot of false positives however, I dare to say even in 
>> excessive volumes.
>> 
>> > On 17 Jul 2019, at 07:48, Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com 
>> > <mailto:chipits...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hello, I played with Coverity. Definitely it shows "issues resolved" after 
>> > bugfixes pushed to git. I know Willy does not like static analysis because 
>> > of noise. Anyway, it finds bugs, why not to use it?
>> 
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> D.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dinko Korunic                   ** Standard disclaimer applies **
>> Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Dinko Korunic                   ** Standard disclaimer applies **
> Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha
> 
> 

-- 
Dinko Korunic                   ** Standard disclaimer applies **
Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha

Reply via email to