Hey Илья, Looks fine and clean. I guess that we would use existing project name (Haproxy) or you would like to continue with your own?
Last, I wonder do we really need verbose (V=1) builds and do you think if they make sense for Coverity builds? Thanks, D. > On 30 Jul 2019, at 10:35, Илья Шипицин <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dinko, > > please have a look > > https://github.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/coverity/.travis.yml#L37-L45 > <https://github.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/coverity/.travis.yml#L37-L45> > > > what do you think (if we will move that to https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy > <https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy>) ? > > ср, 17 июл. 2019 г. в 16:36, Dinko Korunic <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > Dear Илья, > > I’ve increased your access level to Contributor/Member. I terms of Travis-CI > scans, there are some catch22s with current Coverity suite as it is compiled > against ancient glibc and ancient kernel headers and requires > vsyscall=emulate kernel boot option to properly work — not sure if that will > be possible on Travis VMs at all. > > I have actual weekly builds that are auto-published to our Coverity Scan > account and they well, require manual interventions, flagging and some day to > day work to get to more usable levels — let me know if you need a hand with > this. You should have all the access required for doing so right now. > > > Kind regards, > D. > >> On 17 Jul 2019, at 13:18, Илья Шипицин <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hello, yep, contributor/member would be nice. Also, I can setup automated >> travis-ci scans >> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019, 3:27 PM Dinko Korunic <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hey Илья, >> >> Let me know if you would like Contributor/Member role for your account on >> Haproxy Coverity account. I was initially more involved and I have started >> configuring modules and parts of code blocks into coherent units, but >> stopped at some point due to lack of time and interest. >> >> There have been a lot of false positives however, I dare to say even in >> excessive volumes. >> >> > On 17 Jul 2019, at 07:48, Илья Шипицин <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, I played with Coverity. Definitely it shows "issues resolved" after >> > bugfixes pushed to git. I know Willy does not like static analysis because >> > of noise. Anyway, it finds bugs, why not to use it? >> >> >> Kind regards, >> D. >> >> -- >> Dinko Korunic ** Standard disclaimer applies ** >> Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha >> >> > > -- > Dinko Korunic ** Standard disclaimer applies ** > Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha > > -- Dinko Korunic ** Standard disclaimer applies ** Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha
