also, I've no idea what to specify in COVERITY_SCAN_NOTIFICATION_EMAIL
(which is mandatory)

чт, 1 авг. 2019 г. в 12:32, Dinko Korunic <dinko.koru...@gmail.com>:

> Hey Илья,
>
> Looks fine and clean. I guess that we would use existing project name
> (Haproxy) or you would like to continue with your own?
>
> Last, I wonder do we really need verbose (V=1) builds and do you think if
> they make sense for Coverity builds?
>
>
> Thanks,
> D.
>
> On 30 Jul 2019, at 10:35, Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dinko,
>
> please have a look
>
> https://github.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/coverity/.travis.yml#L37-L45
>
>
> what do you think (if we will move that to
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy) ?
>
> ср, 17 июл. 2019 г. в 16:36, Dinko Korunic <dinko.koru...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Илья,
>>
>> I’ve increased your access level to Contributor/Member. I terms of
>> Travis-CI scans, there are some catch22s with current Coverity suite as it
>> is compiled against ancient glibc and ancient kernel headers and
>> requires vsyscall=emulate kernel boot option to properly work — not sure if
>> that will be possible on Travis VMs at all.
>>
>> I have actual weekly builds that are auto-published to our Coverity Scan
>> account and they well, require manual interventions, flagging and some day
>> to day work to get to more usable levels — let me know if you need a hand
>> with this. You should have all the access required for doing so right now.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> D.
>>
>> On 17 Jul 2019, at 13:18, Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, yep, contributor/member would be nice. Also, I can setup automated
>> travis-ci scans
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019, 3:27 PM Dinko Korunic <dinko.koru...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Илья,
>>>
>>> Let me know if you would like Contributor/Member role for your account
>>> on Haproxy Coverity account. I was initially more involved and I have
>>> started configuring modules and parts of code blocks into coherent units,
>>> but stopped at some point due to lack of time and interest.
>>>
>>> There have been a lot of false positives however, I dare to say even in
>>> excessive volumes.
>>>
>>> > On 17 Jul 2019, at 07:48, Илья Шипицин <chipits...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello, I played with Coverity. Definitely it shows "issues resolved"
>>> after bugfixes pushed to git. I know Willy does not like static analysis
>>> because of noise. Anyway, it finds bugs, why not to use it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> D.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dinko Korunic                   ** Standard disclaimer applies **
>>> Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Dinko Korunic                   ** Standard disclaimer applies **
>> Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha
>>
>>
>
> --
> Dinko Korunic                   ** Standard disclaimer applies **
> Sent from OSF1 osf1v4b V4.0 564 alpha
>
>

Reply via email to