Is that right? I have a 1 TB drive in a usb3.0 enclosure running off my
mobo. Using CrystalDiskMark, I find that the read/write performance is
faster to a usb 3.0 drive than to an internal drive on a SATA port. In
some cases almost a factor of 2, but not generally.
Is that right?
How does esata compare? I currently don't have an esata enclosure
hooked up so I can't test.