Is that right? I have a 1 TB drive in a usb3.0 enclosure running off my mobo. Using CrystalDiskMark, I find that the read/write performance is faster to a usb 3.0 drive than to an internal drive on a SATA port. In some cases almost a factor of 2, but not generally.

Is that right?

How does esata compare? I currently don't have an esata enclosure hooked up so I can't test.

Reply via email to