Shouldn't. I honestly wouldn't read anything into the failure other than, well, parts fail and sh** happens.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of FORC5 > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:14 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [H] Seasonic RMA > > already received a emailed form to email back for RMA issue. Very quick. > > let ya know. Unit was new in January. Mounts upside down in a Lian-Li > case, could that have any effect ? > > fp > > At 01:49 PM 7/7/2011, Greg Sevart Poked the stick with: > >Have not had to RMA one yet. All parts--even high quality ones--fail, but > >how the company handles the RMA is important. The good news is that if > >SeaSonic proper sucks at RMAs, there are a number of SeaSonic-OEM'd > units > >from other companies that may do a better job at it. Please do keep us > >updated as to how the process works out. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware- > > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of FORC5 > > > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:25 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [H] Seasonic RMA > > > > > > First Seasonic failure, not that old. runs on a ups. > > > > > > Trying to RMA but Seasonic website keeps telling me serial number > > > wrong. Model is a SS-650km but only model in the pull down is for a > > > x-650km. may be their bug. > > > > > > This RMA will decide for me if they are worth it. PSU is way more > > > unit then needed in this box. > > > p8h67 mb with a i5 2500k > > > 8gb ddr3 1333 > > > 2 crucial c300 256mg ssd in raid 0 > > > 1 500gb wd ( backup drive with bounceback) > > > 1 dvd burner. > > > > > > replaced Seasonic with a new Antec 550 I had on the shelf. I like to > > > have spare parts around, usually PSU and drives new. ( lots of used > > > parts in the *pile*) 8-) > > > thanks > > > > > > Anyone had to RMA a Seasonic PSU yet ? > > > fp > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Tallyho ! ]:8) > > > Taglines below ! > > > -- > > > The butler did it. > > > > > > > > > >__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > >signature database 6272 (20110707) __________ > > > >The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > > >http://www.eset.com > > -- > Tallyho ! ]:8) > Taglines below ! > -- > The test: Behavior in times of controversy and challenge.
