But you gota admin omega, my nazi account with your name with the swastika
avatar was damn funny!


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony "omega"
Sergi
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Client side radar question

We banned you because you kept attacking admins, and then created 3
accounts to call me a nazi.

If you don't understand why you were banned for that, you have mental
issues. -- you're posting as "steamsucks", and your first post here was
an attack on it and valve. You need to learn to interact with people
when you don't understand something.

-omega
http://www.frontline2.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlcoders-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle
> Sent: November 24, 2003 3:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Client side radar question
>
> Ok, I found the problem. The problem was not with the client angles or
> origin being updating, I was using the VGUI.  Meaning I was using
small
> little rect's as players and updating the position of each one on a
label.
> As it turns out animation with the vgui is very limited , it really
only
> updates about 10 times a second (this Is just an estimate, im not sure
> what
> the actually number is) however, I changed it and made the little
player's
> sprites and it runs VERY smooth now, just as smooth as cs. I will add
some
> nice flashing fading effects too when im all done. Perhaps even a
tutorial
> (as long as its not for wavelength, those fuckers banned me), seeing
how I
> don't think anyone has done a client-side radar. Another thing that's
good
> is that's its based off the vgui, the back image scales identical to
each
> resolution. However I wont be able to scale the sprites like I can the
> background radar circle, but at least it wont take up any less or more
> window space in different resolutions like the old radars did.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Client side radar question
>
> Good call, I will use that.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RDG
O'Sullivan
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Client side radar question
>
> extern vec3_t v_origin, v_angles;
>
> These are declared in view.cpp, and are updated every frame prior to
> rendering.
>
> -randomnine-
>
> > I have completed a clientside vgui radar which works with player
> coordinates
> > entirely found in the client code. However, this works fine and all,
but
> the
> > coordinates including the angles of even the client only gets
updated as
> > many as 10 times a second. So what happens is it looks like the
radar is
> > running about 10fps and its really choppy especially if you turn
around
> > really fast.  So I was thinking about doing some kind of prediction
> where
> I
> > delay the update a whole 10th of a second, just enough so I know the
> next
> > angle of the client and I do some kind of interpolation in-between
> updates
> > bases off the real time between real frames and the angle between
the
> first
> > and the second. in other words I fake the missing in between frames.
I
> could
> > do this, but it would be a lot of work for something that's already
> done.
> Is
> > there any other way to get the client viewangle ACCURATELY every
frame?
> > Right now I use
> >
> >
> >
> > base_player->angles[1];
> >
> >
> >
> > where base_player is real client
> >
> >
> >
> > cl_entity_t *base_player = gEngfuncs.GetEntityByIndex(
m_nEntIndexOrigin
> );
> >
> >
> >
> > I use that angle as a subtraction to the raw_angle I find using the
acos
> > between both origins of the client and the current target.
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyway, it just seems like the angle only gets updates 10 times a
second
> > (roughly). My radar is running every frame. So should I proceed with
> > prediction, or should I find another variable or view angle which is
> more
> > accurate?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
>



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders



_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to