How quickly (when your past beta testing) are cheaters banned? Is it
instant?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch


> Nosteam and the like will be considered cheats (and users will be banned
> for using them).
>
> - Alfred
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Armstrong
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 6:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch
>
> Will VAC2 prevent the use of nosteam though?
>
> Not much point in having them banned if they come right back in 10
> minutes.
>
> -Plasma
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 12:40 PM
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch
>
>
> > [quote] If you have any cheats for multiplayer games installed on your
>
> > computer, now would be a good time to uninstall and stop using them.
> > [/quote]
> >
> > So is Valve taking the stand that once a cheater is OK as long as it's
>
> > not during our pre-released timeframe that we'll be watching period?
> > How about you start logging last week and then take that information
> > into effect
> next
> > week so you smoke ALL of the detected cheats currently in use instead
> > of letting them shut them off long enough for you to start your
> > testing and give myg0t time to find a way around that too so they can
> > all turn them on again. Our view is that if you're low-life enough to
> > have EVER use them
> than
> > you have violated the TOS of the purchased game and they should be
> > dealt with as such. But then again this is Valve we're talking about
> > and they
> only
> > give a "bite" with no teeth. You have a published TOS that you need to
> stand
> > behind and MAKE the cheats/hacks an issue of the past. Not give them
> warning
> > that the update is coming. We've dealt with these people for nearly a
> > year without your help and now you give them the opportunity to
> 'redeem'
> > themselves. Sure, ok. If they discontinue use of cheats that your
> > company has allowed to propagate then who are we to complain right?
> > Ultimately,
> you
> > left the people that give your clients a place to play in the wind and
> some
> > of us stuck through it all. (We support 1.6 but not CSS) We gave you
> nearly
> > a year to do something about it. The facts speak for themselves.
> >
> > To all employees of ValveSoftware: You are obviously not able to deal
> > with the cheating/hacking of your software. Your history has proved to
>
> > the
> entire
> > community that you are unable/unwilling to take the necessary measures
>
> > to dela with cheating/hacking. I implore you to acquire some type of
> > association with the AC community to save your game from
> self-destruction.
> I
> > can say without reservation that I personally know that over 50% of
> > the people I know that were avid CS players have left the game for
> > CoD, BF/DC, Bia. That perspective shows me that there is a complete
> > lack of confidence that Valve will follow through with their TOS
> > and/or they are unable to do so. The fact remains that for your game
> > to continue to be the leading edge of online gaming that AC needs to
> > be TOP priority. History has shown your view otherwise. IMMEDIATE,
> > SWIFT, and DECISIVE action is required to deal with the onslaught of
> > cheating/hacking in the game that you are in control of. If you can't
> > handle the job then it only makes sense to give the job
> to
> > a dedicated team that can. That does no harm to your firm but affirms
> > your company's desire to keep pure the game that you spend so much
> > time/money
> in
> > developing.
> >
> > I hope these words do not fall on deaf ears.
> >
> > Ray S.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred
> > Reynolds
> > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:32 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch
> >
> > VAC2 is top priority right now, check your Steam client for the
> > message we released today about it.
> >
> > - Alfred
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 4:26 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch
> >
> > Sure, great, whatever. I've been here for years as well and I've seen
> > about
> > 11 months go by since the last VAC update. So how about that quote in
> > late December of "VAC2 is coming 'soon'"?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ook
> > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 5:19 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch
> >
> > If you consider what goes through this list a "torrent", what do you
> > consider what goes through the SteamPowered forums? :-)
> >
> > I would imagine that Valve has very strict rules governing who can
> > post here and what they can say. Most companies do, or at least once
> > their lawyers soak them for a million dollars for something some
> > mouthy employee posts, then they have such policies :)
> >
> > I've been on this list for a couple of years, and we have seen several
>
> > Valve people come and go. For the most part we have received silence,
> > and then every now and then someone like you pops up and actually
> > contributes to the list, answers questions, and addresses issues. For
> > a while. Then one day they vanish, and we get nothing but silence for
> > another six months. I imagine most of us that have been around here
> > for a while are 1) glad we get what support we do get and 2) have lost
>
> > a lot of respect for Valve because of the many prolonged episodes of
> > silence that we get. I think I speak for most if not all of us when I
> > say we are very gratefull for your presence here, and all you
> contribute.
> >
> > And don't forget - we are on the outside looking in, and all we know
> > is what you tell us. You might take for granted information that none
> > of us have access to. Maybe you aren't allowed to talk about things
> > like how many programmers you have, what they work on, what their
> > plans are priorities are, etc. Over the years we have discussed many
> > problems here and we come away from these discussions frustrated and
> > angry because Valve won't tell us what is going on.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 1:32 PM
> > Subject: RE: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch
> >
> >
> > > This is the dedicated server list, not a HL2DM one (we are accepting
>
> > > of all mods on this list ;-) Actually lots of people in the company
> > > subscribe to this list but only a couple of us are game enough to
> > > dabble our toes in the proverbial torrent of this list. There is
> > > also no shooting of messengers, Valve has a very flat and
> > > egalitarian structure (I am a programmer working on a large range of
>
> > > projects, I just also happen to participate in this list).
> > >
> > > - Alfred
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graham
> > > Robinson
> > > Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 12:21 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [hlds] Alfred: Delay in HL2DM patch
> > >
> > > Alfred,
> > >
> > > I'm sure that I speak for everyone on this mailing list when I say
> > > thank you for actually listening and responding to us. But when you
> > > say that the HL2DM team are preparing the update*, where are they?
> > > Don't they subscribe to their own mailing list? You seem to be the
> > > messenger, which inevitably means you will be shot (probably with
> > > some
> >
> > > form of awp) for just passing on someone else's information.
> > >
> > > * Obviously you said 'we' here but you have said this in different
> > > emails.
> > >
> > > Graham
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:05:35 -0800, Alfred Reynolds
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> We are preparing the release right now, it will be out later today.
> > >>
> > >> - Alfred
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > archives,
> >
> > > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > archives,
> >
> > > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to