Wait, what? I think you have me confused with someone else - I have said
that the mailing list is NOT a Valve support line, it is for server
admins to help eachother.

I'd really suggest taking a break from whatever it is you're doing if a
little joke about TCP/IP fun gets you in a twist. You should probably
take it easy.


On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:50 -0500, SakeFox wrote:
> This coming from the person that states that the mailing list is for 
> support and not spam then a hour later spams the list with jokes about 
> irc clients.
> 
> everyone seems to have a opinion for everyone else, but it never applies 
> to them self.
> 
> Now this was stupid personal attacks and is spam.
> 
> msleeper wrote:
> > If people kept their opinions to themselves about what should or should
> > not be SPAMMED here, then all we would have to read is the same 3 or 4
> > people complaining about the same single error that everyone has known
> > about for weeks. I seriously think some of you have problems with short
> > term memory with how often you type the exact same emails about the
> > exact same problem.
> >
> > Valve has said they are aware of the problem, they are going to fix it,
> > and they do not have a time table. What more do you want? Rather, what
> > more insight have they ever provided or given when there was a known
> > issue? It's not their place to keep us up-to-date with their daily
> > tasks. Personally I would rather them work on fixing the problem, then
> > spending an hour or two a day answering every single bitch and moan that
> > gets pasted here. But maybe that's just me.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:28 -0500, SakeFox wrote:
> >   
> >> "To help them help each other we have set up some mailing lists that 
> >> provide a forum for server administrators and MOD programmers to discuss 
> >> issues that pertain to running a /Half-Life/ dedicated server or 
> >> creating a /Half-Life/ MOD."
> >>
> >> This time out bug is a issue with the DS and in so is a valid topic to 
> >> be talking about.
> >>
> >> on another note, if you don't like a topic that is being discussed 
> >> please don't post on it. You complaining on makes it worse and you are 
> >> causing your own issues. If people would just keep there own opinions to 
> >> them selfs on what should and should not be allowed on here issues like 
> >> this wouldn't be a problem.
> >>
> >> Evan Kaufman wrote:
> >>     
> >>> You are missing the forest for the trees, Karl.  Valve is not
> >>> responding to your constant bitching here, yet several of us are by
> >>> telling you that this is not the place for it.
> >>>
> >>> Valve doesn't use this list on a regular basis, but we do.  You are in
> >>> effect NOT bitching at Valve, but bitching instead at us.
> >>>
> >>> We do not have the power to fix this bug.  Valve does.  Bitch to them.
> >>>  Go to valvesoftware.com, click "Contact", and go from there.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Karl Weckstrom <[email protected]> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> Please post the Mailing List FAQ that states all this. Until then, I 
> >>>> think you're going to have to live with it.
> >>>>
> >>>> At this point, the sheer number of people experiencing it (everybody) is 
> >>>> cause for alarm. Thus far I have found no workarounds, but it's 
> >>>> certainly not from a lack of trying.
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: [email protected] 
> >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Evan Kaufman
> >>>> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:02 PM
> >>>> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
> >>>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Time out at map change
> >>>>
> >>>> <unlurk>
> >>>> Agreed, it is a serious bug, and they are clearly aware of it and of
> >>>> how upset people are about it.  The point remains that THIS IS NOT THE
> >>>> PLACE FOR COMPLAINTS.  This is the place to:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Gather or inquire technical details of said bug
> >>>> 2) Share and discuss any work-arounds for said bug
> >>>>
> >>>> Airing of grievances belongs on forums and blogs and Valve's customer
> >>>> support channels, not on a mailing list for independent server
> >>>> operators.
> >>>> <lurk>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Karl Weckstrom <[email protected]> 
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> I second Patrick. It *IS* annoying.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you're a server admin that cares about the experience of the player, 
> >>>>> then how can you not find this annoying? How can you not be frustrated?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm at wits end with this bug. I still fail to see how Valve could have 
> >>>>> let such an egregious error slip by them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe you don't run any TF2, DOD:S or L4D servers?
> >>>>> Maybe you do and you don't really care about your players?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To be honest, I don't care what your reasoning is. This is a serious 
> >>>>> problem that's getting lots of airtime here. And until the server 
> >>>>> operators get some satisfaction from Valve, expect it to continue.
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
> >>> please visit:
> >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
> >> please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >>     
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to