Just out of curiosity, how do you know? You can't know if they have done
something. I'm not sure how much trouble have these f2p cheaters been to
others but usually when we ban one, we never see the same guy again
because it's too much bother to make another account than just pick next
server from the list.
Then if there is the case if i think you mean, that someone targets
particularely your server and causes havok, that can be a problem. But
these fellows who cheat should always be reported through their Steam
profile. I recently got confirmation that it's not just for statistics.
Some sort of improvement on the cheater issue should be implemented as i
see 1-3 cheaters per week. Used to be 1 per 2-4 months.
-ics
3.3.2012 11:43, AnAkIn . kirjoitti:
As if Valve never thought of doing that. Back when F2P got released
they said they would do something against people creating multiple
accounts, and they never done anything.
2012/3/3 Rob Liu<[email protected]>:
Here's my 2cents on this issue.
Make Steam guard mandatory. And put a limit on how many free to play
accounts a user can create?
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Spencer 'Voogru' MacDonald
<[email protected]> wrote:
That doesn’t do much good for things like aimbots.
I personally don’t like the idea of preventing them from joining, but
simply taking away things that they might be able to abuse. My dodgeball
servers for example doesn’t allow f2p to use, or hear anyone on voice comm.
Too many unbannables just spewing mic spam all day.
- Spencer.
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cameron Munroe
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 10:22 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] Hackers on the rise
That is like saying I will not sell my product to "greens." It is not
effective and can do way more harm then good. You might just want to beef up
your security with sourcemod and some plugins.
On 3/2/2012 7:19 PM, Spencer 'voogru' MacDonald wrote:
One options is to just not allow f2p accounts. Or make them a lot more
vulnerable to votekicks/votebans. I'm considering making it so it only takes
half as many votes against f2p to take action.
On Mar 2, 2012 6:34 PM, "Russell Smith"<[email protected]> wrote:
If you can put up with the excessive memory leaks then you can use
SourceTV on autorecord. Then just reference the time of the ban with the
time of the recorded demo and you have yourself a demo of the supposed
cheater.
On 3/2/2012 3:32 PM, Cameron Munroe wrote:
Now if it only would start a demo and then ban them...
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
https://list.v...
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
