>If we're really talking about player choice, here, then you have to remove the "default effect <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_effect_(psychology)>" that gives one group of server preferential treatment over another to achieve "true" player choice.
I'm all for player choice. If I want to play in a community server, I should be able to. But I also feel that Valve made a game and this game was balanced (I know the arguments against that it's balanced, but let's say that it's balanced as Valve wants it balanced) for 24 people. Why shouldn't the default game be the default choice? When you play Skyrim, do you have mods auto loaded that you didn't pick because it's community created? When you play any other multiplayer game on a server, is the non-base game ever selected as default? If not, then why should TF2 default to Custom? I know you aren't saying it should, but others here have. They want Community servers to be the first thing that players see and IMHO, the default game should be the first thing. Once they see that, then if they want to explore, they can. Despite what people say that new players can't unclick a checkbox. The interface being passed around looks like a good compromise as long as when you select Community for the first time, a little warning shows up saying that the game they are entering is not the standard game and can be modified so people know what is going on. But yeah. The default should be ... well... the default. On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 4:53 PM, E. Olsen <ceo.eol...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have a vendetta against community servers. I just dislike when >> community server owners think they are gods gift to TF2 and demand special >> treatment to the determent of those who want to play vanilla TF2. > > > I'm not looking for special treatment. I'd be satisfied with "equitable" > treatment. > > If we're really talking about player choice, here, then you have to remove > the "default effect > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_effect_(psychology)>" that gives > one group of server preferential treatment over another to achieve "true" > player choice. > > For example, I've often heard the argument that "if players want community > servers in quickplay, they can change the settings", and if that is true - > shouldn't the inverse also be true? If it is, than why give any one group > default preference over another? > > Why not simply allow the players to decide? > > ...and I'm sure there are plenty of arguments about servers plastered with > Pinion ads, or servers selling premium BS - but valve already dealt with > all of that, so both of those arguments are moot. > > At any rate, I honestly don't think Community can only flourish in the > absence of Valve's servers, and vice versa. There simply needs to be > options presented which gives both equal exposure to the players, and let's > them decide (without artificially steering them towards one or another). > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Phillip Vector <t...@mostdeadlygame.com> > wrote: > >> >Logging cl_connectmethod >> >> That tells you for every server that you own. Not every server in >> existence. Your statement of "The majority of players still click play >> now instead of using the server browser" is missing something. It should >> say, "The majority of players ON MY SERVERS". >> >> Of course, we don't have proof of this even on your own server, but I'm >> willing to accept that those who connect to your servers do so via the >> "Play now" button. >> >> You still can't say that the majority of players though since you don't >> have that data. >> >> >I'm curious as to why you have a vendetta against community servers. >> >> Nice strawman there. I don't have a vendetta against community servers. I >> just dislike when community server owners think they are gods gift to TF2 >> and demand special treatment to the determent of those who want to play >> vanilla TF2. >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Robert Paulson <thepauls...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Logging cl_connectmethod. >>> >>> Why do you presume that I am pulling it from my ass? >>> >>> I'm curious as to why you have a vendetta against community servers. Did >>> you get put on saigns and couldn't figure out how to type "valve" in server >>> browser, so you are resorting to flaming the server owners here? >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Phillip Vector <t...@mostdeadlygame.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >The majority of players still click play now instead of using the >>>> server browser so removing valve servers from the browser list probably >>>> does very little for your own servers. >>>> >>>> Please tell me how you managed to get access to this data. Presuming >>>> you aren't pulling it from your ass of course. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Robert Paulson <thepauls...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are you all really surprised by this? Valve doesn't care about >>>>> community servers anymore. The moment 1 person complains that they >>>>> couldn't >>>>> wait 15 seconds for quickplay, it gets removed. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway you are all acting like half life 3 was announced. >>>>> >>>>> The majority of players still click play now instead of using the >>>>> server browser so removing valve servers from the browser list probably >>>>> does very little for your own servers. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek < >>>>> proph...@sticed.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Endless waves of communities explaining how quickplay (and other >>>>>> changes ofc) destroys communities, nothing happens. >>>>>> Two people on the mailing list moan about valve servers being >>>>>> excluded from the list, instantfix. GJ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 04.07.2015 23:32, Kevin C wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You have got to be kidding me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/tAmWXj6.png wink wink nudge nudge >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/4/2015 5:28 PM, Eric Smith wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Temporarily reverted Valve official quickplay and matchmaking >>>>>>>> servers not being listed in the server browser while we look into this >>>>>>>> further >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>>>>>>> archives, please visit: >>>>>>>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>>>>>> archives, please visit: >>>>>>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>>>>> archives, please visit: >>>>>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>>>> please visit: >>>>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>>> please visit: >>>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
