Wouldnt that be sweet? No more worries about different distributions... ;p

/Bjorn

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, M. Kraaij wrote:

> Are BSD binaries an option, Alfred?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 6:15 PM
> Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Alfred We Need Your Help
>
>
> > Our linux platforms are aimed at being stable development platforms, NOT
> > at being production servers. You would be much better served by having
> > the guys on this list that run server farm chip in.
> >
> > We run Slackware 9.0 with a 2.6.21.5 kernel for the dev platform and we
> > have Debian etch on a test machine. Both machines are SMP.
> >
> > - Alfred
> >
> > tsuehpsyde wrote:
> >> --
> >> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> >> Alfred,
> >>
> >> I don't mean to direct this straight to you, but you're the only real
> >> contact within VALVe we have that actually gives us information or
> >> takes our advice/suggestions on this mailing list. With that said,
> >> can we get some
> >> sort of straight forward answer as to the recommended platform or
> >> configuration for SourceDS for Linux? I realize that Linux does take
> >> a back
> >> seat to Windows as far as SourceDS goes (look at the incident a year
> >> or so
> >> ago when VALVe released a linux update that would not even start in a
> >> vanilla state), but some sort of input would at least help us get on
> >> the
> >> right track.
> >>
> >> These are the three core questions I would like to see answered by
> >> Alfred or someone else directly from VALVe and not a third party:
> >>
> >> 1. What distribution of Linux does VALVe use for testing and
> >> deployment?
> >>
> >> 2. What kernel version (and also patches if applicable) are used in
> >> this
> >> platform? Also, can we get the kernel configuration, or even the
> >> kernel's .config file?
> >>
> >> 3. What other system packages and versions core to the OS (glibc,
> >> etc.) are
> >> used?
> >>
> >> Those three questions, I don't think, are asking a lot from VALVe,
> >> considering the amount of time and money we put into hosting the
> >> game. I
> >> don't like the idea, but I'd down-grade packages as needed on my
> >> servers to
> >> keep things running smoothly. Also, I'm not sure *what* you guys are
> >> doing,
> >> but it seems that the updates are a back and forth game with my
> >> ability to
> >> renice my game server processes to -20 (if set, both game servers
> >> spike to 99% CPU used). This is a core functionality to my servers,
> >> and I (as well as
> >> other Source administrators) would really appreciate having it fixed.
> >> It
> >> appears on my servers when two game server processes are set as -20.
> >> However, with one set to -20 and the other left at 0, it's fine.
> >> Again, this fixes/breaks with updates on and off and is sort of
> >> frustrating since
> >> setting the process priority is written into my scripts, and I have to
> >> remove it every time it breaks (and game server performance suffers
> >> from
> >> it).
> >>
> >> Thanks for your time,
> >>
> >> -tsuehpsyde
> >> SourceKills.com
> >> --
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> >> archives, please visit:
> >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to