It was CSS, maybe it can differ from TF2. A hyperthreaded quadcore would do fine in my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone 4 Den 21/05/2011 kl. 17.49 skrev "[email protected]" <[email protected]>: > How do you get 64 slots on TF2? If you are talking about CSS, I don't > think it is comparable to TF2. > > Also thank you for the related responses, but I am interested in > running TWO 32-slot TF2 per physical core. x3370's can only run ONE > 32-slot TF2 per physical core. I am wondering what cpu I need to run 8 > of them on the many 4 core 8 thread cpus that Intel makes. > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Christoffer Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: >> 1. Its a good question. Many administrators optimizes their kernel to get >> better performance, which i can recommend. I have en overclocked i7 which >> runs on 3.73ghz and it did at least not have any problems at all with >> running a 64 slot server filled with bots. I would say that 3 ghz would do >> fine. >> >> 2. If you are running more servers than the amount of cores, i recommend to >> use the load balancer. If you run the same amount or less than the amount of >> cores i would use taskset. >> >> /Chris >> >> Sent from my iPhone 4 >> >> Den 21/05/2011 kl. 04.56 skrev "[email protected]" <[email protected]>: >> >>> I have 2 questions: >>> >>> 1. What is the minimum CPU to run 2 32-slot TF2 servers on 1 physical >>> core with almost no hiccups (I know they are unavoidable when there >>> are 10 sentries on the screen firing etc.)? I know someone that has an >>> i7 860, and it still seems to have a few gaps and interpolation errors >>> once every 5 minutes or so when there are 2 full 32 slot servers on >>> one physical core. Can anyone comment on this? >>> >>> 2. Is it still recommended to use taskset on multiple CPUs? I tested >>> my quad core last month on Ubuntu 10.10 server, and I needed taskset >>> to prevent the "sv" on net_graph from jumping all over the place. It >>> brought down the variance from 10 ms to 2 ms. However, people keep >>> telling me that taskset isn't needed anymore. Who is correct? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
