On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 01:23 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> On 13/03/2013 23:47, Michael Thomas wrote: >> >> What I find most telling is that after 25 years, printers are still the >>> canonical >>> example of the "need" for SD. But printers have entire programs/wizards >>> that >>> support their existence, so they're really lousy as a canonical example. >>> It would >>> be nice for things to attach themselves to my net and not require their >>> awful apps >>> to be installed. >>> >> Exactly. That's why the architecture needs SD, in a nutshell. >> >> > I'm not terribly convinced that SD is even the whole story which is why > I have such a hard time with the short shrift the architecture document > gives it. > > After my trip down to Widgetmart I dump open a bag of ip widgets, > would they self organize? Should they self-organize? Everybody here > keeps talking about zeroconf, after all. If not, what is expected of me > (the end user) in their use and/or assembly? What problems are we > trying to solve in my home? Is SD as its currently implemented by > Apple *exactly* what we want in the long term? How do we even know > how to answer that question if the problem/requirements aren't even > documented? > > It's a working group document. Feel free to contribute text as well as criticism. -K- > Mike > > ______________________________**_________________ > homenet mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/homenet<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet> >
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
