Ted - you wrote something that surprised me (in line)... On Oct 15, 2014, at 11:34 AM 10/15/14, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Gert Doering <g...@space.net> wrote: >> I explained my reasoning. Multiple times. Here and on other lists. Again >> and again. > > When you repeat yourself again and again, people stop listening to you. > There was a consensus call done on this, and the architecture document > contains the results of that consensus. If you have some additional > objection to raise, you should raise it, but I'm very sorry, you do have to > show your work. You can't just make assertions about what you think is > true, and expect your opinion to count in the consensus call. We don't vote > in the IETF, so opinions just don't make sense in that context. > > In particular, you appear to be arguing as if ULAs and GUAs are treated > identically by IPv6 stacks, but they are not. Really? In what way are they not treated identically by IPv6 stacks? - Ralph > So while I agree that there is a real problem making this work for > multi-homed homenets (a problem, by the way, which homenet has decided to try > to solve), this is completely orthogonal to the question of whether we should > use ULAs in the homenet. > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
