Le 16/10/2014 00:49, Ted Lemon a écrit :
On Oct 15, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
See, I don't find that ideal at all. If I'm swinging around on my
backyard trapeze watching the flying wallendas instructional video
from my home jukebox, I really don't want to have my network break
connectivity because I happened to switch to my neighbor's wifi and
I was using a ULA when I could have kept connectivity with a GUA.
This is simply a non-sequitur. It has nothing to do with homenet.
I agree it has nothing to do with homenet.
It is a problem at work, at airport, in public garden, in the street, at
the restaurant - in general in every place where WiFi arrived.
It is an entirely WiFi connection management problem. In Windows it can
be avoided by unchecking the "Automatically Connect To" attached to that
WiFi ESSID, or more brutally by removing that undesired profile completely.
Alex
It has to do with how the stack works on your home, and what the
propagation of radio waves looks like in your back yard. The
assumption that you will be able to access your jukebox over your
neighbor's wifi contains packed in it so much new protocol work we
could fork several working groups to handle it.
As far as homenet goes, i'd rather it not bake in any assumptions
about ULA's beyond what is already there.
I hear you. But why should the working group care what you prefer?
I don't say that to be dismissive, but to encourage you to give a
reason that isn't just an opinion.
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
