Jonathan West writes a comprehensive post that some of you strongly agree with, 
making the case for seniority rule in amateur ensembles.  I want to submit a 
minority opinion, that amateur horn sections thrive when there is a  good 
section leader, the principal, who doesn't necessarily need to be the best 
player in the section, but he needs to be competent relative to the performance 
level of the ensemble.  Whenever the horn principal is significantly below the 
competence level of the ensemble, the section does not thrive, has frequent 
turnover, and often has vacant positions.  To a director, when I plead my case 
to him, I don't need to insist that I am right about this, since all he has to 
do is recall for all the past years that he hasn't had a stable horn section 
and that he often has had vacancies in the horn section.  I don't feel that I 
need to plead my case with any of you.  If you have an example of a thriving 
horn section that has an incompetent 
 principal (relative to the level of the ensemble), I would like to hear of 
your experiences with this. It is great when a principal can also lead, help, 
set standards, and encourage the other section players.

Regards,
Larry



      
_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to