Gonna agree here.  I could hear that there were pitches higher and lower
than others, some better in one ear than the other, as they seemed to move
around.  Don't know if this was due to me or the speakers.  Once I knew the
melody, repeated listenings were probably prejudiced to hear it.  Sampled at
44 KHz (looking at the file properties), anything that's not 5.5 KHz, 11
KHz, or 22 KHz is going to have a significant amount of aliasing that
becomes more noticeable as the frequency goes up.  Notes without aliasing
will seem quite pure in comparison.  It would be interesting to hear this
as a purely analog signal.

John Baumgart

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Robert Dickow
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 6:28 PM
To: 'The Horn List'
Subject: Re: [Hornlist] Name that (high frequency) tune!

I recognized the tune right away, but less by pitch than by rhythm and
contour. That was because on my computer, the sound file was generating a
set of 'inharmonic' differentials, obscuring the intended pitch. The Nyquist
frequency suggests a minimum 10+ khz sampling rate, if these really are sine
waves. If they have any overtones at all, you have to double the highest
desired frequency of interest and sample at that rate X 2, or set up a
filter. I think we're hearing a an awful lot of fold-over.

Bob Dickow
Lionel Hampton School of Music

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 5:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Hornlist] Name that (high frequency) tune!

I found a place to host a sample melody I generated with Sine  waves between
7000Hz and 11000Hz.
 
Name that tune! (I used something with a particular key...). 
 
_http://www.mediafire.com/file/d64vyqgt3lz18ri/highmelody.wav_
(http://www.mediafire.com/file/d64vyqgt3lz18ri/highmelody.wav) 
 
Let's see if people can really tell frequencies apart above 5000Hz.
 
-William
 
 
In a message dated 11/12/2010 6:41:05 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:

On 12Nov  2010, at 12:07 , Michiel van der Linden wrote:

>    "Melodies played using frequencies above 5000 Hz sound rather  
> peculiar. You can tell that something is changing but it doesn't sound  
> "melodic" in any way."
>
> I've not yet found an audio example  online, but will keep looking.

Creating your own example on your  computer should be easy, I'll try that in
a couple of days if nobody  else  does.

Daniel

_______________________________________________
post:  [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/dickow%40uidaho.edu

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/john.baumgart%40com
cast.net

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to