Hi Emmor,

The document is really nice, thanks for sharing. IMHO we really need clear
guides like this,

Have put your document here, and added some comments.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cv3oic5ujJ8_VxqyXQ5xCM3mYhlKTghosJwGH1dkKsc

Thanks,
Bjoern

On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 at 16:35, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >There was a suggestion that the editing software could have regional tag
> exclusions. An example would be highway=living_street, a legally defined
> type road that is not found in Africa.
>
> There are 2,921 highways currently labelled living_street in Angola.  I
> suspect the problem is people do not read the documentation but copy the
> tags of another mapper and sometimes these are not as accurate as one might
> like.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On 29 July 2017 at 10:48, Vao Matua <vaoma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have shared my presentation from SOTM Africa here:
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_2QVFnCIYvpQllEWnR2bWhTVnM
>>
>> There are quite a few photographs of different types of roads in Africa
>> along with the aerial view.
>>
>> At the workshop in Kampala there was a good deal of discussion and
>> frustration expressed regarding inconsistencies in descriptions and usage.
>> There was not a consensus that additional tags were needed, however, there
>> was general agreement that the Africa Highway Tagging Guide needed some
>> clarification.
>> There was a suggestion that the editing software could have regional tag
>> exclusions. An example would be highway=living_street, a legally defined
>> type road that is not found in Africa.
>>
>> I like the guidance Bjoern gave us below and the nice presentation. My
>> only suggestion would be that metal roofs could be one factor in
>> determining path/residential/unclassified. I have seen many remote villages
>> only accessible by path that have some metal roofs.  I think the same could
>> be true in Nepal?
>>
>> Here is a draft 1-page document for use in mapathons
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1s0QB-B1MKqsRs51jyDsCuldEXsJ_xK17k0-kRyKmxoo
>> <https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_2QVFnCIYvpVW1xdHZ1RFF0dms>
>> The order of tag listing is "upside down" emphasizing the most common
>> routes first.  highway=service should probably be added and primary could
>> be dropped.
>>
>> Let's continue this conversation.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Emmor
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Bjoern Hassler <bjohas...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear friends,
>>>
>>> I think it would be really good to have a simple set of instructions for
>>> people at mapathons. Sure, these can always be amended as per instructions,
>>> but it would be nice to have a default set.
>>>
>>> In our "MM Intro" presentation, we came up with this slide
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xFDiMaWRj1RBlXzVYlKp06yE2Ja9Q5rmD9-bPDp1TWo/edit#slide=id.g2326c0c777_5_390
>>> where we try to give practical guidance, and try to delineate the
>>> features (i.e. give "negatives" rather than just the definition).
>>>
>>> The slide says:
>>>
>>>    - Can it be passed by a vehicle? → unclassified (or better) /
>>>    residential / track (not path)
>>>    - Does it connect areas where people live (running within and
>>>    through villages)? → Unclassified or better (not residential / not track)
>>>    - Does the road only run within a village or residential areas (not
>>>    a through-road) → residential
>>>    - Does the road only run to fields (agric. use)? → track
>>>    - Is it not passable by car (4x4)? → path
>>>    - Note: A metal roof arrives by vehicle → roads to houses with metal
>>>    roofs are unclassified or residential (not path).
>>>
>>> (The set is aimed at cases where M/trunk/1/2/3iary is already in
>>> existence, as is often the case.)
>>>
>>> I do think that a set like this will help new mappers with decision
>>> making.
>>>
>>> What do people think? I've copied it here
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Highway_Tag_Africa#Mailing_list
>>> in case people want to edit.
>>>
>>> Bjoern
>>>
>>> On 29 July 2017 at 12:09, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking at the wiki changes it looks like mainly clarifications I tend
>>>> to not use tags higher than tertiary as I think they are best left to local
>>>> knowledge or someone with more specialised knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On 28 July 2017 at 23:25, Vao Matua <vaoma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I led the discussion at the Highway Tagging workshop on the last day
>>>>> of SOTM Africa.
>>>>> There was quite a bit of discussion and agreement that the existing
>>>>> tagging can be frustrating, however, we did not generate any new proposals
>>>>> for additional tags.
>>>>> We did agree on some changes to the Africa Highway Tagging Guide
>>>>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa> which has
>>>>> now been updated to reflect not only Functional Class but also 
>>>>> Construction
>>>>> class and width.
>>>>> I am in the process of preparing a one page reference guide for use in
>>>>> carto-parties and mapathons and by new mappers.
>>>>>
>>>>> General changes or clarifications:
>>>>> A residential road serves people who live adjacent to it.
>>>>> An unclassified road connects settlements and collects traffic from
>>>>> residential roads, tracks, and paths
>>>>> A track allows people to access agriculture areas, but not connect to
>>>>> a settlement
>>>>> A path can function like an unclassified highway, but is restricted to
>>>>> foot traffic or 2 wheeled vehicles
>>>>> Highway = tertiary or secondary may be paved, but not by default.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know if you have questions or suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Emmor
>>>>> (Palolo)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I seem to recall some one posting recently that following discussion
>>>>>> at the SOTM Africa in Uganda 2017 some changes had been made to the wiki.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could some one highlight these.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> HOT mailing list
>>>>>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> HOT mailing list
>>>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Reply via email to