* From Matthew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Not as a specific Sysex string (at least not as far as im aware .. i havent
had to much need to mess with the RM1x's sysex). I think what many of you
guys are getting hung up on is the fact that the RM1x isnt a static
sequencer. it wasn't designed for this type of micro-editing. it was
designed as a performance instrument. a way to play live and tweak stuff.
That's why so many of the parameters dont sound out specific sysex or CC's.
This box is meant to manipulate midi data on the fly. If you need to micor
edit just record the outgoing info into a different sequencer ... one made
for static compositions ... and play that back at some later date. This is a
box for playing live, its got some pretty decent editing tools but its not a
fully function midi editor, like logic or cubase. 

m.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Kellogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: recording rm1x jamz


* From Scott Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

i think the original question was whether the rm1x sends mute and section
switching info to the midi out port.  does it?

scott

Matthew Allen wrote:

> * From Matthew Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Or why not just record both audio and midi into an external sequencer. I
> mean when you mute the channel nothing plays on it, right? so If you
capture
> the midi stream into an external sequencer you have an exact copy of the
> performance. when im working on complicated pieces this is what i do and
its
> really nice to be able to go back into the midi stream and clean up
> mistakes.
>
> m.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Kellogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 9:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: recording rm1x jamz
>
> * From Scott Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am doing all of my sequencing on the rm1x.  The track mute and section
> switch stuff is great to use for performance.  If you are wanting to
capture
> that stuff for playback, consider recording the audio output into an app
> like
> Cakewalk.  That way, your performance in recorded in audio, which in some
> ways
> is easier to deal with than MIDI.  You can splice the best parts of
various
> audio passes together in order to patch together a complete performance.
>
> scott
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> The Yamaha Hardware Sequencer (qy/rm1x) Mailing List is a free service
> provided by TekLab and is open to all members of the Internet community.
> For more information about this list and other TekLab Mailing lists visit
> our web site: http://www.teklab.com/services/mailinglists/
> **> NEW: TekLab Music Technology Forums:  http://www.teklab.com/forums/
<**

___________________________________________________________________________
The Yamaha Hardware Sequencer (qy/rm1x) Mailing List is a free service
provided by TekLab and is open to all members of the Internet community.
For more information about this list and other TekLab Mailing lists visit
our web site: http://www.teklab.com/services/mailinglists/
**> NEW: TekLab Music Technology Forums:  http://www.teklab.com/forums/ <**
___________________________________________________________________________
The Yamaha Hardware Sequencer (qy/rm1x) Mailing List is a free service
provided by TekLab and is open to all members of the Internet community.
For more information about this list and other TekLab Mailing lists visit
our web site: http://www.teklab.com/services/mailinglists/
**> NEW: TekLab Music Technology Forums:  http://www.teklab.com/forums/ <**

Reply via email to