On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > A combination of hydrogen, tX, xwax, ardour, superlooper and > freewheeling so to speak...
superlooper is client/server out of the box... so aggregating that is *very* possible. >> So, I guess the question is: What sucks about the AL workflow? >> > > This is an excellent question and there are few people who can > authoritatively comment on this. I have a friend who I could try to tap. I'll also ask around, too. > IMO the thing that sucks about AL is the complexity of the total app. I > don't see things like time stretching and multi track recording being a > necessity in hydrogen especially when working in a Linux/jack env. Agree on the complexity. By time stretch: I mean ability to make on-the-fly tempo changes without losing pitch in an audio loop. Whether done by beat slicing or pitch-shifting algorithm... real-time tempo changes is core functionality IMHO. Peace, Gabriel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list Hydrogen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
