Teguh, Waktu saya belajar di ABerdeen, pelajaran geochemistry menggali teori-teori ini. Teori abiogenic dipakai umum di Rusia dan sebagian North Sea. Tapi memang di Indonesia belum banyak dipakai.
Salam, Herman -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2004 09:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [iagi-net-l] The Origin of Petroleum Saya rasa teman-teman ada yang sudah banyak yang baca tulisan dibawah di Oilgas-proof mailing list oleh salah seorang senior geologist di Indonesia, yaitu pak Rudy Phoa. Salah satu dari "Thingking Out of the Box",menurut saya. Siapa tahu ada teman-teman yang belum baca. Sangat Menarik dan boleh direnungkan sambil minum kopi di depan atau di taman belakang rumah selama weekend. Salam, Teguh Perth, June 2004: Rudy S.K. PHOA Is the origin of petroleum âBiogenicâ and/or âAbiogenicâ ? The Issue: Being a member of the Western School, most Geochemists and Petroleum Geologists in Indonesia (including me) remain convinced that crude oil and natural gas have organic origins. Are we correct with our view? Have we ignored or neglected something? What is the impact if we have left out the abiotic theory and what should we do? The debate about the biogenic or abiotic origin of the hydrocarbons has heavily intensified in recent years. In 2003, the AAPG Research Committee took an informal limited âHedberg Conferenceâ (80 to 100 participants). The debate keeps getting hotter. On June 9 â 12, 2004, a formal Hedberg AAPG Conference will be held at the Institute of Petroleum in London with the topic âOrigin of Petroleum â Biogenic and/or Abiogenic and its significance in Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production. The Organizers are Brian Abbott of the Institute, Michel T. Halbouty, Peter Odell of Erasmus University, Barry Katz of Chevron Texaco and E.A. Mancini of Alabama University. Day 1 will deal with the origin questions and case studies, day 2 on the exploration strategies using both models and day 3 with the migration issues under both scenarios. This is essentially the big issue between the Western and the Eastern (Russian) school of thoughts. In the past, we hardly give a room to see what the Russian have on their table. Language problems? No, majority of the Russian Papers are translated in English. Those in favor of the Biogenic Origin have advanced the following observations: 1. Petroleum contains groups of molecules, which are clearly identified as breakdown products of organic molecules that occur in plants. Michael Lewan, the famous research Geochemist for the USGS in Denver feels that his research has done a very good job of stimulating production of Petroleum in the Lab. The Lab and fieldwork have put together a very good picture. Comments: J.F. Kenney et al of Gas Resources Corp. in Houston (2002) concluded that there is no real debate about the origin of petroleum. Natural petroleum does NOT evolve from biological material. 2. Petroleum frequently shows rotation of the plane of polarization. This is normally a characteristic of biological matter and absent in fluid of non- biological origin. This optical activity is sometimes totally absent and it would be difficult to suppose that thorough destruction of the biological molecules had occurred. 3. Some Petroleum shows a clear preference for molecule with an odd number of carbon atoms over those with an even number. Such are from breakdown of a class of molecules that are common in biological substances. As for the optical activity, the odd and even carbon number are sometimes totally absent. Thomas Gold (USGS, 1993) theorizes that biology is not a nuclear reactor. It canât make carbon-13 or â12. 4. Petroleum is mostly found in sedimentary deposits. Oil and Gas Exploration is focused in sedimentary basins. Debate about the origin of Petroleum: Dimitri Mendeleev (1877): Petroleum was born in the depths of the Earth and it is only there that we seek its origin. Mendeleev is the Great Russian Father of Chemistry that created the âPeriodic Systemâ that every student in this world learn in high school during the beginning of his Chemistry lessons. It is not fair just to ignore the thought of this great man, just because we come from a different school? Kudryavtsev (1959), the most prominent and strongest advocate of the abionic theory argued that no petroleum resembling the chemical composition of natural crudes has ever been made from genuine plant material in the laboratory and in conditions resembling those in nature. This statement has since become known as âKudryavtsevâs Ruleâ and many examples have been noted in different parts of the world. Most notable voices outside Russia was Sir Robert Robinson, President of the Royal Society (1963, 1966): He studied the chemical make-up of natural Petroleum in great detail and concluded that they were mostly far too hydrogen-rich to be a likely product of the decay of plant debris. It cannot be emphasized that Petroleum does not present the composition picture expected from modified biogenic products. H.D. Hedberg (ex. President of the Geological Society of America, 1964) indicates that it is remarkable that in spite of its widespread occurrences, its great economic importance and the immense amount of the research devoted to it, there perhaps still remain more uncertainties concerning the origin of petroleum that of any other commonly occurring natural substance. Methane is found in great ocean rifts in the absence of any substantial sediments; in fissures in igneous and metamorphic rocks, even at great depths; in active volcanic regions (flames have been seen during the eruption of Merapi in 1932. Kravtsov et. al. (1975) reveals that the amount of methane emitted over the time-span of a volcanic activity could far exceed the reserve of a gas field; and massive amount of methane hydrates (methane-water ice combination) in permanent frozen ocean deposits, where adequate quantity of biological source material is doubtful. Based on the isotopic features, the general area of petroleum origin could be identified. Crude oil from the Middle East can be distinguished from South American or any crude from somewhere else. From the hydrocarbon content in meteorites, Sokoloff (1889) discussed the âCosmic Origin of Bituminaâ. Now we know that major planets and their satellites like Jupiter, Saturn and its satellite Titan, Uranus and Neptune and its satellite Triton have large amount of methane and other hydrocarbon gasses in their atmospheres. The surface of the Comet Halley core, recently observed by spacecraft, is most reasonably interpreted as one of tar, complex polycyclic hydrocarbon molecules (Clemett, 1993). This discussion could be continued and at the end, this paper would be too long to be distributed by the Oilgasprof-group and becomes a publication. What is the impact? An Explorationist might dismiss the entire conversation, except for these points; Â If the origin of petroleum is abiotic, hydrocarbon will be abundant with no possibility of constrained supply. Alternative energy would be history. Â Petroleum generated by abionic processes could occur anywhere. Exploration is NOT limited to sedimentary basins and depths. Â This might change our status back to a âNet Oil Exporterâ. What should we do? Â We have the most volcanoes in the world. Major part of Indonesia is still virgin, as exploration for oil is focused in sedimentary basins. Â If not yet initiated, at least we should seek the approval and guidance from BPMigas, Migas and Pertamina to form a group to follow up the abiotic theory. I think that Prof. Dr. Soejono Martodjojo, my good old friend and an excellent explorationist that I always respect and admire, could be nominated as one of the potential candidate to lead this group. Â It might be too late to attend the convention. I would suggest contacting Michel Halbouty, who is an Indonesian friend or Barry Katz of Chevron Texaco for the available papers and handouts of the upcoming convention. Contact USGS and AAPG (Explorer) for the available published past reports. References: Â J.F. Kenny et. al. 1. Peak Oil, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 2002 2. Fossil Fuel without Fossils, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 2002. Â Dimitri Mendeleev: Lâorigine du petrol. Revue Scientifique, 2e Ser. VIII, 1877 Â N.A. Kudryavtsev: Geological proof of the deep origin of Petroleum, Issledovatel Geologoraz Vedoch. Inst. No.132, 1959 Â Robert Robinson: 1. Duplex origin of Petroleum, Nature 199. 1963 2. The origins of Petroleum, Nature 212. 1966 Â A.I. Kravtsov et al: 1. Inorganic generation of oil and criteria for exploration for oil and gas, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1975 2. Distribution of gas-oil-bitumen shows in the Yakutian diamond province. International Geological Review 23, 1981. 3. Gases and bitumens in rocks of the Udachnaya pipe, Earth Sci. Sect. 228, 1976. Â W. Sokoloff: Kosmisher Ursprung der Bitumina. Bull. Soc. Imp. Natural Moscau, 1889 Â S.J. Clemet et. al.: Measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in interplanetary dust particles. Lunar Planetary Science XXIV, 1993. Â Thomas Gold; The Origin of Methane (and Oil) in the Crust of the Earth, USGS Professional Paper 1570, 1993.
