In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 03/06/2006
at 02:44 PM, Lock Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Last, if the group takes responsibility for software maintenance then
>must do so (politically anyway) independently from any group
>member.
And if the group takes responsibility for software maintenance then
the group MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; that
means cleaning up after themselves and not asking another group to
bail them out after shooting themselves in the foot.
One other thing: the applications group should *not* have the ability
to update APF libraries. But it's not my dog.
>Tony's note about children and power tools applies to adults as
>well;
Indeed, but of course I've never seen anybody mess up SMP. What never?
No, never. What never? Well, hardly ever. Once is too many.
>Good luck.
They'll need it L-(
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
