In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/14/2008
at 08:08 AM, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Actually, JCLIN works no matter what the data set LLQ is. When you code
>JCLIN, you specify the DDDEF (or DD) names *as* LLQs. You never specify
>any *real* LLQs.
Are you a betting man? Quite frequently the JCLIN is the same JCL as you
ran in a prior job. The old stage 2 concept may be dead for the operating
system, but it is alive and well for some products, e.g., IMS.
>However, when I experimented with this a while back, I found that it
>worked as expected only when the HLQs of the base name and alias were
>the same -- or more precisely -- expected to be in the same catalog.
Would you really want two release of the same product to be cataloged in
different user catalogs?
>Try as I might, I could not figure out how to get the system to see
>'SYS1.ALIAS.OF.BASE' as an alias of 'MYUID.BASE'.
>(Perhaps I overlooked something.)
And I can't figure out why you wanted to ;-)
Shirley making SYS1.foo.llq an alias of SYS1.foo.&foorelease..llq is good
enough for tracking releases.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
