In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/12/2008
at 09:42 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I believe that ease of installation of "squatty box" products arises from
>providing customers guidance in this area, and the customers' willingness
>to follow that guidance.
Sounds good; when is it going to happen? It sounds like a welcome change
from the installs I've seen on the squatty boxen so far, with their
dependency Hell and their stepping on each other's registry data.
>Is there somewhere a customer who has an esthetic dislike for "SYS1" and
>uses an alternative HLQ for production data sets?
Have you stopped beating your wife? Have you been paid off to steer
everybody to putting everything in the Master Catalog? Why not ask why
they named things the way they did instead of inventing ludicrous
explanations?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
