On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:31:03 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: > >I would rephrase Peter's formulation, > >"(it better not have any 4-byte relocatable adcon's)", > >slightly, changing it to > >"it better be AMODE(64)". > >His point is in a certain sense, or at least ought to be, obvious; but >that does not make it less important. Students, mine anyway, often >fail to understand that AMODE is relevant for tables too. > Are you saying that of a 64-bit ADCON in a module loaded above the bar, only the lower 32 bits will be properly relocated unless the CSECT is declared AMODE(64)? Ouch! Is even a warning issued?
Do the declared AMODE and RMODE affect the format of RLD entries output by the assembler? How does this affect compatibility with older products, evel HEWLKED? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
