>I understand your point about documentation being wrong, but for the most part >when an ISV (or IBM) tells me they require a permission (a RACF facility >resource, >APF, SVC), I have to take them at their word. I'm not going to install the >product >and test without each and every one of those documented requirements just in >case >they made a mistake. I have been at shops where the security/auditors needed >letters from the vendor about their SVC(s).
You're of course absolutely right! I was confused about Barbara's problem and had better not responded before doing further analysis. I'm sorry about that unlucky post. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
