On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:52:58 +0100, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>> No. I guess security isn't much of a concern for ADCD. I wouldn't have >> expected UACC(READ). No clue why alter would be given to some >> userids, AFAIK READ is good enough and there are no higher >> authorities granted with UPDATE or ALTER to the resource. >The books actually talk about making these program controlled profiles >UACC(READ). Otherwise bad surprises might happen. In case I wasn't clear, I was referring to the BPX.DAEMON profile in the FACILITY class. That should not have UACC(READ). Regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
