I used to love the 3180 with a custom logmode;43x80 primary, 27x132 secondary. 
But nothing beats a 3290 with VSPLIT.


-- 
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Tom 
Brennan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 7:38 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Statement of Direction


External Message: Use Caution


I had a 3278-4 on my desk for more than 10 years, and never changed
until PC's came along.  The best thing was the super sharp text.  The
worst was alt-number for a PF key.  There were people around me with
color screens, and even one guy with an APL keyboard, but the color
screens didn't seem to have the sharp resolution of a 3278.

On 7/29/2026 3:09 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
> I had two 3278-4s for a while, then swapped one for a 3279-5 when I worked on 
> a product that did color. Those were GREAT machines, with great keyboards.
>
> Being in the D.C. area, I used to say that if they said the missiles were 
> headed our way, I'd just get under my desk--I might get crushed, but I was 
> pretty sure the 327x would survive just about anything!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> Pommier, Rex
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 5:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Statement of Direction
>
> Hey, Radoslaw, I resemble your remarks!  I had a 3290 on my desk decades ago. 
>  Man that thing was noisy!
>
> Rex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 3:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM Statement of Direction
>
> They drop veeeery old equipment, which actually cannot be attached to any CPC 
> which could run current OS.
> Even 3380 as an emulation is no longer available in contemporary DASD systems.
> OSAD - you can define it, but it is useless. So you will not loose anything 
> by dropping it.
> 3290 - the only person who remember this dev is Shmuel (that's a joke).
> 3330 - really? It's older than me!
> 9032 - ESCON director. Current OS support z15 and next generations.
> ESCON was available until z196.
> etc.
>
> What about shops using old equipment? They also use old OS.
> I strongly doubt some shop like UBS or BofA is using new shining z17's 
> connected to Bus & Tag or ESCON attached peripherals.
>
> My $0.02
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
> W dniu 29.07.2026 o 21:50, Tom Brennan pisze:
>> I was thinking it's the UNIT= parameter in an IOCP, but I could be
>> wrong.  Is that considered a device class?  I never learned HCD.
>>
>> For old-to-new DS8000 hardware migrations, I'll often get a CSV config
>> file from the old DS8000, run it through a script, and come up with
>> CLI commands that will make the new box look like the old one.  I saw
>> some 3380's on a client's box while doing this maybe 5 years ago.
>> Probably gone by now.
>>
>> On 7/29/2026 9:20 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
>>> If only there was some sort of definitive way to tell, like IBM
>>> specifying the device types and models for which they're dropping
>>> support... /s
>>>
>>> Srsly, device type and model is the canonical way IBM describes
>>> things; I'm gobsmacked that this SoD doesn't list them. Actually it's
>>> even worse: it DOES say "Device Types" but then lists device
>>> *classes* (like "CTC").
>>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to