Each DUMPCLASS specifies DAY(n) determining the day of the week it runs, UNIT(3590-1), and STACK(99) to "fill up" a tape. TAPEUTILIZATION specifies 97% of a 3590-1. AUTODUMPSTART specifies a three hour window of which no more than 15 minutes is being used.
>-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Lizette Koehler >Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 5:57 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Stacking SMS and non-SMS disk on same HSM dump tape > >Could you provide more detail? > >What parameters do you have set in HSM for stacking on your dump >classes? >What timeframes are involved? When do you dump and expect stacking? >Could you provide your SETSYS parms for dump and stacking? > >HSM should stack all the volumes on one tape based on the following >criteria > >Copy pool dump processing is given priority in this phase. Dump >processing proceeds as follows: > >> Copy pool volumes with affinity to the processing host that are to be >stacked >> Copy pool volumes with no affinity that are to be stacked Non-copy >> pool volumes with affinity to the processing host that are to be >stacked >> Non-copy pool volumes with no affinity that are to be stacked Copy >> pool volumes with affinity that are not to be stacked Copy pool >> volumes with no affinity that are not to be stacked Non-copy pool >> volumes with affinity that are not to be stacked Non-copy pool volumes >> with no affinity that are not to be stacked Non-SMS volumes > >Are you sure all of the volumes you are dumping will fit on one tape >volume? > >Have you tried just setting up one volume SMS and NON-SMS in your dump >class and see if that works? > >Are you manually running the process or is DFHSM running it on a >schedule? > >Thanks > >Lizette > > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of EXT-Schwarz, Barry >Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 5:03 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Stacking SMS and non-SMS disk on same HSM dump tape > >On z/OS 1.11, the HSM manual says a stacked dump tape can contain dumps >from both SMS and non-SMS packs. However, with STACK(99), every test >case I have run results in SMS packs first going to one 3592 tape >(genned as 3590-1) and then non-SMS packs going to a second tape. I >have tried with 1, 2, and 3 SMS packs of different sizes and HSM always >changes tapes after processing all the SMS packs in the dump class. > >Has anyone else run into this and how did you solve it? > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
