I have never been able to do what you are attempting in the last 9+ years. (I tried, it would have solved some problems for me.)
Maybe Glenn Wilcox can jump in here and enlighten us all.. <snip> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of EXT-Schwarz, Barry Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:47 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Stacking SMS and non-SMS disk on same HSM dump tape So the manual is just flat out wrong? : Re: Stacking SMS and non-SMS disk on same HSM dump tape > >In my opinion, this cannot be done. > >In my shop, HSM, performs all SMS managed functions, followed by all >non-SMS managed functions > >There is a further separation in the non-SMS managed functions. All >"stacked" functions are performed before "non-stacked" functions. > >HTH, > ><snip> >On z/OS 1.11, the HSM manual says a stacked dump tape can contain dumps >from both SMS and non-SMS packs. However, with STACK(99), every test >case I have run results in SMS packs first going to one 3592 tape >(genned as 3590-1) and then non-SMS packs going to a second tape. I >have tried with 1, 2, and 3 SMS packs of different sizes and HSM always >changes tapes after processing all the SMS packs in the dump class. > >Has anyone else run into this and how did you solve it? </snip> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
