>OI DEBFLGS1,DEBAPFIN TURN ON APF LIBRARY BIT If you have enough control over your system not to have to worry about this blatant system integrity exposure, then why would you not just make the data set APF authorized?
>ADRNAPF Regarding ADNAPF(64), yes they exist. And if you don't know exactly what you are doing you will almost certainly be introducing a system integrity exposure. To a large extent, they are intended for loading (non-executable) data. >Job 5: RC=0 It is extremely unlikely that syncsort does anything funky. The odds are really good that this job, for whatever reason, results in no fetches that are satisfied only from joblib/steplib. Does it matter, for the purpose of this discussion, that if the module exists both in (unauthorized) joblib/steplib and the lnklst, the fetch will succeed? For LNKAUTH=LNKLST, the only time you get the 306 is when the module exists only in an unauthorized concatenation. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
