On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:07 PM, phil yogendran <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > We recently performed a DR exercise and on one of the LPAR's, the CSA was > smaller by about 800k. Parmlib specification in DR and production were > identical. The LPAR affected is our designated 'network' box so there are > no apps or subsystems like CICS or IMS running on it. > > Any thoughts on what could make CSA shrink at IPL, particularly when > parmlib was not changed? The IODF in DR would have been different but I > can't see that affecting CSA. > CSA rounds to 1M boundries. A bigger IODF could be due to more devices, which mean more UCBs, and so less CSA, assuming that the 1M boundry didn't get bumped up to the next higher boundry. Just a possibility. > > Looking forward to your comments. > > Thanks, > > Phil > -- The unfacts, did we have them, are too imprecisely few to warrant our certitude. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
