On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:12 PM, phil yogendran <[email protected]> wrote:
> I did think it was a bigger IODF but in my case SQA in DR has gone down > implying a smaller IODF. However, CSA has also gone down. Here's some > inform from DR and Prod; > > DR: SQA 988K CSA 3.43M > > Prod: SQA 1.11M CSA 4.28M > > Ah. The reverse happened. Your IODF at work is _bigger_. The common area (NUC, SQA, CSA, etc) is always on a 1M boundry. So your CSA specification + IODF in Prod causes the boundary line at Prod to be 1M higher than it is a D.R. the excess of which ends up as CSA (which gets all the "slop" from the rounding up). -- The unfacts, did we have them, are too imprecisely few to warrant our certitude. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
