I did think it was a bigger IODF but in my case SQA in DR has gone down implying a smaller IODF. However, CSA has also gone down. Here's some inform from DR and Prod;
DR: SQA 988K CSA 3.43M Prod: SQA 1.11M CSA 4.28M On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Bob Rutledge <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/5/2016 3:07 PM, phil yogendran wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We recently performed a DR exercise and on one of the LPAR's, the CSA was >> smaller by about 800k. Parmlib specification in DR and production were >> identical. The LPAR affected is our designated 'network' box so there are >> no apps or subsystems like CICS or IMS running on it. >> >> Any thoughts on what could make CSA shrink at IPL, particularly when >> parmlib was not changed? The IODF in DR would have been different but I >> can't see that affecting CSA. >> > > If your production CSA size is considerably larger than the specification > in parmlib, the DR IODF could be scarfing more SQA which would affect the > size of CSA. > > Bob > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
