Thank you John. I will review your recommendation and then go back to all our systems and try and implement it ASAP. This is clearly a preventable issue and I don't want to deal with a re-occurrence.
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:56 AM, John Eells <[email protected]> wrote: > phil yogendran wrote: > >> Thank you very much, all. You have been most helpful. I have run into this >> problem before so I need to spend more time on it. All of your suggestions >> and recommendations will help me get to the bottom of it. Much >> appreciated. >> > <snip> > > Some time ago, I wrote a post about setting the CSA specification such > that *specified* CSA ended halfway between 1M boundaries. As *allocated* > CSA is rounded up to the next segment (1M) boundary, this maximizes the > elbow room within which you can make LPA list and IODF changes without > crossing a 1M boundary by accident. Checking once in a while helps keep > you "centered" within the segment. > > If your other DR changes add up to more than 1/2M worth, then perhaps > offsetting from center in the right direction would smooth the transition > without requiring a special DR-only CSA specification and still provide > reasonable elbow room for day-to-day changes. > > You should be able to find my old post in the archives somewhere... > > -- > John Eells > IBM Poughkeepsie > [email protected] > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
