I've done the same thing. In my case, it was TSOE TRANSMIT, which at the time 
used VIO for the temporary data set created for transmission purposes. That can 
be changed in PARMLIB IKJTSOxx TRANSREC to something other than VIO. VIO really 
makes no sense in a modern mainframe environment but  can still cause mischief 
if not throttled back. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 7:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Count with no Data and no Key ? (CKD internals again)

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:49:05 +0000, Christopher Y. Blaicher 
<cblaic...@syncsort.com> wrote:
>
>The access methods detect the key=0, count=0 records and process them as EOF, 
>which is how they signify the end of a PDS member.  Every member has an EOF 
>record with the rare exception of a member that ends at the end of the track 
>on the last track of a data set.  ...
>
VIO has its own surprising rules.  I once (circa XA) caused paging space 
exhaustion by reading an uninitialized data set allocated as
    UNIT=VIO,SPACE=(0,large)

-- gil


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to