Well, it's important to replace all of that COBOL code using a language like C that came out this decade. Oh, wait, it didn't. <dws>
But didn't Multics have B1 before MVS did? Reading the transcript I would have to assume that either the government is in the process of upgrading its 360/65 fleet to ES/9000 or that the author is inventing hisfacts out of the whole cloth. Tom was too kind. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Bill Johnson <00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 11:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls >From the you can’t make this up department. Mr. Marchant agrees with me. https://secure-web.cisco.com/1yL63m40iBCeQbG1WvmNZsrKa4FxGrXYc1ASKMXpNVzdwtqEkgBeRY3ZdRhqcYpE8x1EGH2oYCOAOaZ2bO_7UCfP3tVCijeenqLOIOeq4mRO5gAjMFyrW655_OndDRRXv6odsUjGx8U63qP3bZTyag1OE4FZs-eJeOB23r82elSblLxXJiu2Fh_IHTw21XRKd28yHEMzSPfBuKtUVSiyFfuGeaGjvjHHoXDdIpUQDoKoNszOoMM3Ar533ngeRAZ6trUZxEHPPYiskU5HZF_GQqM-hEUDOJDMBGXFyLw3zKUGwb_hECp5TXhm7GT2n576H_0c98_THsaujOvUko7S4PpkfbD9ZkQaxNo4pf6l9gFUTkzD-Mx19UmKzIMfs0HAbM4gr_mr1K2Ay7i-N7A-BtF1h8JktxkkDKEIiQ4yaS7ooLyoQlRDwtipt90OA9DNHxHsFGI0ASBqXUhnRS_pB1g/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.compuware.com%2Fproving-z13-modern%2F Talk of “modernization” of mainframe systems is often code for redesigning mainframe-based applications and implementing them to run on Windows, or less frequently, on Unix or Linux. None of these systems can match the security capabilities of modern mainframe operating systems. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, June 4, 2019, 10:45 AM, Tom Marchant <0000000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 00:01:01 +0000, Bill Johnson wrote: >noise and plenty of it. PKB. You have posted more to this thread than anyone else. You have claimed that security is the main reason people stay on the mainframe, and posted a few articles that do not say what you claimed they say. You have insisted several times that your MVS systems have never been hacked without providing any evidence or serious reasoning as to how you could know that. "40 years of experience" is not evidence. It's called appeal to authority, and it is a logical fallacy. When your assertions are questioned, your response is to attack those who question you rather than provide evidence. Another logical fallacy. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
