John, Absolutely, my big issue I was at the mercy of CA code. Not blaming them, but it’s a CA product and I wished their doc was better.
Scott On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 7:39 AM John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:40 PM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: > > > Of course it was reentrant, but was it good form? I prefer to protect > code > > against wild stores by marking it as r/o. > > > > Total agreement that it is bad form in today's world. For subsystems, there > is the SSCT to anchor things. And, as I do for my re-entrant code: a > Name/Token pair (primary address space level) to hold a 64-bit pointer > (even in 24 or 31 bit mode, I make sure the pointer is 64-bit clean).. > > > > > > -- > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > People in sleeping bags are the soft tacos of the bear world. > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
