> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:48 AM > To: SM; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation- > report-01 >
<SNIP> > > > The results in Section 4.1.2 mention "Author vs. Third-Party". That > > is more about ADSP than DKIM. > > True. It should probably come out. > This is of interest beyond ADSP. It helps the community understand who is signing. There has been much discussion of the value of Author vs. Third-Party signing outside of the ADSP discussion. As Jeff points out, this may be related to implementations defaulting to signing this way (or not easily allowing 3rd party signing). I don't think it should come out. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
