MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy >> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:48 AM >> To: SM; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation- >> report-01 >> > > <SNIP> > >>> The results in Section 4.1.2 mention "Author vs. Third-Party". That >>> is more about ADSP than DKIM. >> True. It should probably come out. >> > > > This is of interest beyond ADSP. It helps the community understand who > is signing. There has been much discussion of the value of Author vs. > Third-Party signing outside of the ADSP discussion. > > As Jeff points out, this may be related to implementations defaulting to > signing this way (or not easily allowing 3rd party signing). > > I don't think it should come out.
I agree. If nothing else, it may be showing implementations which have bad access control mechanisms. But it seems to me that stats on how people are signing is generally interesting, and isn't linked to ADSP at all. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
