> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:15 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01 > > > d= relations: 73% of the signatures observed had a direct > > correspondence to the From: header , meaning the "d=" value in the > > signature matched the > > domain found in the From: header field. > > Since there is no binding in RFC4871, which is the focus of the > implementation report, it seems more correct to me to just leave that > information out. It's more of an ADSP statistic.
I should've read the whole thread before replying. If consensus is to keep the statistic in, I'm fine with Jeff's proposed language. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
