> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:28 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation- > report-01 > > [...] > to be: > > 1.1. Signing Identity > ... > The signing identity specified by a DKIM signature is entirely > independent > of the identities present in any particular header field. The > interpretation of > a match that is possible between the signing identity and the > identifier in > another field is outside the scope of DKIM.
Works for me. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
