On 10/1/2010 10:47 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> As a part of the IETF implementation report for Draft Standard, I suspect >> it is distracting or possibly worse, since it implies that that bit of >> data is relevant to the protocol and its deployment. > > I agree that's true. But on the flipside, this particular statistic pointed > out that the slight text change you proposed in your previous message might > be a good idea for the DS version. It might therefore actually be useful to > include as justification for such an edit should anyone ask.
wow. i had entirely missed that you received excellent training as an attorney. (or is this just an artifact of the high quality of Canadian education?) In other words, good point. I withdraw my suggestion. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
