On 10/1/2010 10:20 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I should've read the whole thread before replying. If consensus is to keep > the statistic in, I'm fine with Jeff's proposed language.
As a statistic in a software reporting tool, I think it's a fine a useful tidbit to include. As a part of the IETF implementation report for Draft Standard, I suspect it is distracting or possibly worse, since it implies that that bit of data is relevant to the protocol and its deployment. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
