As I understand it, Jorge is highlighting that he is not an expert in employment and Equal opportunity law. That is a specific expertise.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:20 AM, tsg <tglas...@earthlink.net> wrote: > On 03/20/2013 07:16 AM, Jorge Contreras wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Margaret Wasserman <m...@lilacglade.org> > wrote: >> >> > > Jorge - did I miss something here - isnt this your job? If not why are you > here? > > Let me respond that further - I believe that there are any number of both > privacy and transparency counsel's in the movement so to speak who would > love to work with such a body to create a transparent set of participation > rules UNDER THE CURRENT PARTICIPATION MODELS AS BROKEN AS THEY ARE... > > Didnt you file an ID yourself not to long ago? In fact I am betting > Professor you know any number of Grad Students who would love such a job if > you catch my drift. > > Todd > > >> Hi Stewart, >> >> On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:04 AM, Stewart Bryant <stbry...@cisco.com> wrote: >> > Age >> > Disability >> > Gender reassignment >> > Marriage and civil partnership >> > Pregnancy and maternity >> > Race >> > Religion and belief >> > Sex >> > Sexual orientation >> >> The U.S. has a similar (although not identical) list, and it may vary a >> bit state-by-state. >> > >> > If we are going to have an itemized list of diversity characteristics, >> > we should not pick and choose, we should include the full list. > > > I would strongly recommend that legal counsel be consulted before any such > "list" is produced or used by IETF/IESG/Nomcom. (FYI, this is totally > outside my own area of legal expertise, so IAOC would need to incur some > expense to hire competent counsel in this area) > >> >> >> While I certainly wouldn't suggest we start discriminating based on _any_ >> of these factors, it is very difficult to measure our results in some of >> these areas, as we do not collect this information from IETF attendees, nor >> do we publish the age, disability status, gender status, marital status, >> religion or sexual orientation of our I* members. > > > What records *do* exist regarding the identify of IETF leadership? Is there > a central repository of at least names/companies of IESG members and/or WG > leaders? > >
