On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Omer Zak wrote:
> My suggestion:
> Unlike the situation a year ago, now we have a non-profit (Hamakor), which
> can issue receipts.
>
> If the non-profit is now approved for income tax deductions, then it may
> be a good idea to ask the non-profit to run a small fund raising drive,
> looking for, say, 9 donors (I am the 10th) for the money to buy the hard
> disks.
> --- Omer
By posting this on Linux-IL, we can potentially get one donor to cover all
the expenses, or several that can split it among themselves. First Come
First Serving.
In any case, I'd like to go public on this, so people will be well aware
of this situation.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
> My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone.
> They do not represent the official policy of any organization with which
> I may be affiliated in any way.
> WARNING TO SPAMMERS:at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
>
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Should I (or someone else - I'm not picky) post the current situation with
> > Ligad and HP and who will finance buying the new disks on Linux-IL? I
> > think we should. The situation has persisted for several monthes now.
> > (or over a year) And meanwhile we cannot upgrade to a newer distribution.
> > (Debian or whatever).
> >
> > How long are we supposed to persist with RedHat 6.2, and with no space for
> > the mirrors? This is getting ridiculos and all of that because our two
> > distinguished sponsors cannot determine which of them should pay for the
> > disks.
> >
> > I say we post it on Linux-IL and see what comes out of it. But I'll wait
> > for what other people here say.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
Writing a BitKeeper replacement is probably easier at this point than getting
its license changed.
Matt Mackall on OFTC.net #offtopic.
