On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Shlomi Fish, from the post of Tue, 30 Dec:
> >
> > How long are we supposed to persist with RedHat 6.2, and with no space for
> > the mirrors? This is getting ridiculos and all of that because our two
> > distinguished sponsors cannot determine which of them should pay for the
> > disks.
>
> I say we should talk to Internetional "Linux is good for Our" Business
> "Money Making" Machines AKA IBM.
>
You mean: address them in private channels (via Hamakor)? After or before
informing Ligad/HP about it?
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
> as for the Plone of JLC, I think it's OK if he maintains his zope and
> all under his own user, and the apache can redirect requests.
>
> --
> Live from New York
> Ira Abramov
> http://ira.abramov.org/email/
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
Writing a BitKeeper replacement is probably easier at this point than getting
its license changed.
Matt Mackall on OFTC.net #offtopic.
