Adding to it Free in FOSS is this:
Free as in FREEdom not FREE as in Free beer

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:38, Gunjan Patidar <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Let me clarify it a little more for you
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 8:22 AM, amit kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> let me justify the points
>>
>> 1. LINUX is lesser user friendly:-
>>
>> -to learn to use command line for an non-engineer is a daunting task .
>
> and a non-engineer doesn't have to. You can find a frontend to even the
> most complex cli commands today. A non-engineer can use linux whole of his
> life without even knowing about the console
>
>
>> -and for other points i am satisfied that it is the resistance to change
>> that LINUX seems hard .
>>  but the fact that non-engineers should go to LINUX is hard ,because of
>> this resistance .
>> an engineer like us enjoys LINUX because it is different and better OS
>> ,but why would a busniessman want to waste his time learning a new thing .
>
> Lets fast forward a few years to the future. Linux (desktop)market share is
> ~85%, windows is down to ~10%. All new pc/laptops come preinstalled with a
> linux distro. A (non-engineer) businessman started using computers few monts
> back(with linux). His long time windows user friends comes to visit him and
> sees him using linux
>
> Businessman: Hey how are you? Its been a long time
> Friend: I'm good. thanks. I see you are using linux
> Businessman: yes, I've to use computers for a few tasks at work
> Friend: why don't you try windows. It looks much easier (to me). It would
> just cost you a few hundred $. (And there is virus, and you need to upgrade
> your hardware, and ...)
> Businessman: You see, I don't use computers much. Just some trivial stuff.
> why would I want to 'waste time learning a new thing'. And I get this os and
> all upgrades free, why would I want to pay for an os. why would anybody?
>
> This is the situation we all are vying for. I hope you see my point
>
>
>> 2. LINUX will be properiatory
>>
>> UBUNTU is not properiatory now because it's under development.it's not
>> visible to us .if you are going for what is written on CD cover than i think
>> you should reconsider yourself.UBUNTU is given for free because:-
>>
>> 1. because they want to see ,what actually we want
>> 2. it's new ,and if you are an UBUNTU user you would realise that it has
>> some damn bad policies ,as compared to REDHAT
>> 3. they are using it as FEDORA ,after UBUNTU is popular they ,would
>> certailny release A REDHAT ALIKE .
>>
>
> If ubuntu want to do that, they should. I don't see a problem here. giving
> away free cds, maintaining servers, paying developers/artists etc requires
> money. what do you think is their stream of income. People like us who don't
> want to pay will always get our downloads for free (as in fedora, redhat)
> because major part of development documentation and support takes place by
> community support. They cannot simply push us away.
>
>
>> OTHER eg's
>>
>> 1. OPEN SOLARIS RECOMMENDS VERY HARDLY TO JOIN IT'S COMMUNITY
>
> why shouldn't they?
>
>
>> 2. UNBREABLE LINUX (ORACLE'S) is given as a distro only when people are
>> willing to use ORACLE technologies (for exact words order a free cd)
>
> Just try to mail them, asking a free cd and mention that you won't be using
> oracle. you just want to try the distro. I'm sure they would give you the cd
>
>
>>
>> 3. REDHAT MAGAZINE clearly specifies what FEDORA is for
>>
>> "
>>
>> People often wonder how to get new capabilities—new packages, new features
>> in existing packages, or even bug fixes—included in Red Hat Enterprise
>> Linux. The process for doing so is straightforward, but may be foreign to
>> those with a background in traditional software products.
>>
>> To summarize, the process is:
>> 1)Get the new code accepted upstream.
>> 2)Get it included in Fedora.
>> 3)Get it included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
>>
>> Although this article focuses on the Linux kernel, the steps apply to all
>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux components and packages."
>>
>> Again, I don't see a problem
>
>>
>>
>>
>> this is what i got from REDHATMAGAZINE.COM
>>
>>
>> i myself believe that LINUX IS MUCH BETTER THAN WINDOWS.
>>
>> well my point is not that WINDOWS is better than LINUX ,but that LINUX is
>> not that great to criticize WINDOWS so hardly .
>>
>> PLEASE explain the security part in detail or atleast send an appropriate
>> link
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:51 PM, rohit <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dont take me wrong there
>>>
>>> but
>>>
>>> >> 1. LINUX is very less user friendly as compared to WINDOWS  . it's
>>> good
>>> >> for engineers like us ,but for common users ,to run LINUX may need
>>> special
>>> >> training against  the user friendliness of windows.
>>>
>>> AS this statement is coming from a earlier and knowledgable windows
>>> user(seems so to me),i dont ACCEPT it....
>>>
>>> give a child a "windows vista" and a "ubuntu(say gnome env.)"  and
>>> tell me...if he can use windows more easily....
>>> nothing is easier than synaptic in ubuntu(or well that mint thing in
>>> linux mint....)
>>> nor is it more beautiful than compiz-fusion
>>>
>>>
>>> >>2. linux is virus free,yes we all proclaim this ,but in reality that is
>>> just
>>> >>because LINUX is less popular than WINDOWS .more of the market is in
>>> hands
>>> >>of WINDOWS
>>>
>>> plus the stability of linux is a well established fact.....not related
>>> to the abundancy of systems in any aspect
>>>
>>> LET me tell you something,,,,i read somewhere that someone could write
>>> on windows driven os's drive by using a linux platform over a network.
>>> U CALL THAT SAFE???
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>3. LINUX is free .we are proud for that ,but it is not that
>>>
>>> I STRONGLY DISAGREE..........
>>>
>>> i dont like linux for cheapness......i like it for it is open source
>>> and would be using ubuntu even if it costs more than that my ram
>>> hungry "VISTA"...
>>>
>>>
>>> the only properiatiory things i like are a couple of games and few
>>> drivers for my system(moving to open source on these also....)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gunjan Patidar
> Henny Youngman  - "If at first you don't succeed... so much for skydiving."
>
> >
>


-- 
Lots o' Luv,
Phani Bhushan

Let not your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right - Isaac
Asimov (Salvor Hardin in Foundation and Empire)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
l...@iitd mailing list -- group http://groups.google.com/group/iitdlug
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to