On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 03:42 -0800, Sharninder wrote: > > > > > > Now I'm confused. Sayamindu's mail suggests that > > anaconda is a > > killer, but that's the *installation* process, no? > > Not something > > that runs all the time? > > > > Sayamindu was right. Anaconda is the killer during the > installation. And I assumed that you would be using > Gnome/KDE as your desktop after installation. Thats > why I said gnome/kde would crawl on anything less than > 256M of RAM. That being said, I'm running Gnome 2.4 on > 128M of RAM and it is slow, but useable. Take your > pick :)
by the way, if you have bandwidth - you may want to take a look at GNOME 2.6 - usually the slow/sluggishness of GNOME is due to Nautilus. Nautilus 2.6 is blazingly fast - though you may have initial troubles adjusting to the new "spatial interface". <shameless plug> http://sayamindu.t35.com/GNOME_2_6.html </shameless plug> -sdg- -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://clai.net/sayamindu] Free Software: the Software by the People, of the People and for the People. Develop! Share! Enhance! and Enjoy! -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
