On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:55, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: > On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 2:32 pm, Raj Mathur wrote:
> Actually Raj, now that I have re-read it, I agree with Hassath that it is > *potentially* offensive to women. While it might be perceived as humorous to > men, it appears condescending to women, and hence seems insulting. > > Since the blog is the official face of Freedel till the main site comes up, I > am making some changes as Hassath has pointed out, *with* an appropriate > notice that this is not the original post. > Thanks Sandip, for making the correction on Freedel. And I would like to say that it was not potentially, but very emphatically in-the-face offensive to women, and anybody else with the sensibility. And I am not labouring a point. If men can see and accept an objection for what it is, without attempting to dilute it, it would help things change for the better. Regards, Hassath _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- [email protected] http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
